Critic of LVMWD gets a strong rebuttal

Critic of LVMWD gets a
strong rebuttal
In answer to James Wrigley’s letter to The Acorn, issue of Aug. 9, it must be said first that it was highly improper for him to have reported the matters discussed in a closed board-attorney session, matters protected by the attorney-client privilege.
Violation of the attorney-client privilege is a very serious act which has been punished with heavy fines and imprisonment.
Mr. Wrigley will not disclose the source of his information. Howev...

Oops! An active online subscription is required to access this content.

Please login below or Subscribe today!