There is life after Lowe’s

On Jan.19, the jury of public opinion delivered its final verdict through the city council: Lowe’s will not be built in the heart of Westlake Village.

As I sat on the dais during this historic vote, I began to reflect on what I had learned from literally hundreds of hours of project analysis. In addition, I began to process what I heard from the voice of democracy as echoed by the wonderful passionate, intelligent people who demanded we maintain the “village” concept that had made Westlake one of the most unique small cities in the entire country.

The people have spoken and I am so pleased with what they have said.

So where do we go from here with the afterlife that follows Lowe’s? What are the marching orders we electeds have received from more than 100 citizens who have spoken?

•“We would like a true town hall center where people can gather, recreate and relieve the stress of everyday life.”

•“We would like to see fine dining and family restaurants anchored by something conducive to bringing people together, such as an Arc Light Theatre, a bowling ally, a miniature golf establishment, a contemporary ice skating rink.”

•Residents also suggested we pursue an anchor that was an extension of the Getty Museum, the Guggenheim, an Imax or the Discovery Center.

•If available, perhaps Mr. Murdoch would be interested in purchasing the property to build an ancillary use for his Dole World headquarters, such as a culinary institute that would complement the world class Four Seasons Hotel and Dole Wellness Center.

•How about a Central Park or Gardens of the World-type botanical gardens for family gatherings, surrounded by other compatible retail and or mixed uses?

•“We need a community center that will meet the cultural and recreational needs of all citizens, from children to seniors. Further, we just can’t keep chasing off our teens from Wendy’s and displacing them.”

The foregoing are just a few of the many positive ideas and dreams that came forth from our intelligent voters during the past year of open dialogue. Perhaps there are others that will surface if we continue an open forum and allow our citizens to share their dream for the future utilization of the 23 acres known as Planning Area C.

On Jan. 30 the council is scheduled to hold its annual goal study session to discuss and prioritize items that are of importance. I will ask the council to create an ad hoc economic development committee comprised of two council members and one or more appointee from each council member that would represent the various stakeholders and homeowner association voices in our community.

I know that there will be some readers who think I am guilty of stirring up unrealistic dreams and expectations for the family of Westlake Village that will only lead to disappointment and disillusionment if the current landowner marches forward with his current entitlement for an office park. I recognize and respect the constitutional rights and entitlements of the current landowner and believe the council does not have the right to dictate what is built on this precious land.

However, at the very least, we have the right to echo what the demographics of Westlake are crying out for. It is then up to the current or future landowner to decide if he will be responsive to the sentiments of their future clients in this market place.